Nothing came up for

Basic Plutus Voting dApp

$15,000.00 Received
$15,000.00 Requested
Ideascale logo View on ideascale
Problem:

现在Cardano的DAO没有办法做智能合约驱动的投票

挑战: F7: DAOs ❤ Cardano
completed Awarded 3% of the fund.
Community Advisor Reviews:
2.8 (21)
Yes Votes:
₳ 148,564,142
No Votes:
₳ 11,819,294
Unique Wallets:
461

经验

我们的团队由知名的前Emurgo和前IOHK员工组成,他们在过去几年里一直在建立Cardano生态系统。

解决方案

我们计划通过Plutus智能合约创建一个开放的链上投票标准,可供任何DAO或DApp使用。

Voting is an essential primitive required by many dApp protocols. From DAOs, DeFi dApps, to treasuries, many usecases require users to vote for for the game theory of the protocol to work.

DeFi protocols are just beginning to come into existence in the Cardano ecosystem, yet in the not too far distant future they will start to look at integrating voting protocols as well.

We will spend time researching and developing design patterns for implementing on-chain voting in Plutus. This on-chain voting will be able to effect protocol parameters held in the Datum as well as altering the Validator of the UTXO (thereby interacting with upgradability). We will release a github repo with an example contract implementing a voting protocol that can be forked by other projects and adapted to their use case in Q1 2022

社区顾问评论

Addresses Challenge

3.4 / 5
7 评论

Does the proposal effectively addresses the challenge?

社区评论 (7)

Commenter gravatar
January 23, 2022

The need seems to be indisputably fundamental, opens up the need to DAOs beginning their own implementations within 6 months, and adds another tool to the shed.

确认你的人性

写评论

Replying to

Commenter gravatar
January 23, 2022

The challenge brief aims to improve DAO infrastructure and enable developers to effectively have the tools which enable the production of dApps similar to those on other chains. The proser looks to create ready made examples and design patterns within a basic voting dApp built on Plutus. An example voting dApp would be high beneficial to the developer ecosystem and improving support and building community assets that would be helpful, very often developers learn best from examples rather than software documentation.

确认你的人性

写评论

Replying to

Commenter gravatar
January 23, 2022

"Currently on Cardano's blockchain platform is still in the early stages of Defi Dapps and other Dapps, so everything has not been fully operational yet. But preparing the platforms and infrastructure for on-chain voting through a Plutus smart contract is absolutely the right step so that when Dapps actually deploy on Cardano's blockchain, they can fully use the this platform to build voting features on its Dapp. I would highly recommend this idea if it can come to fruition. But with this proposal still in the stage of researching solutions. Therefore, I also cannot determine its actual impact. Hope to see you implement this proposal in the following funds"

确认你的人性

写评论

Replying to

Commenter gravatar
January 23, 2022

This proposal is a great and complex implementation that could improve adoption and usability on cardano blockchain and amount of ADA. The proposal articulates how it will add value to the Cardano ecosystem and for the stakeholders. At the same time the statement of how problem is to be solved is only specified with implementation and not throught business case that support economic model (eg. revenues of the provider, cost related to the service,…). However the objective of the proposal is interesting, but I think it's important to improve details about the solution for the challenge (eg. with business case support).

确认你的人性

写评论

Replying to

Commenter gravatar
January 23, 2022

This proposal is about offering an open solution for on chain voting to be used by any DAO. Voting is a basic function required by almost any DAO. No details are provided about the technical solution, but the concept is clear. This project has the potential to accelerate DAO Dapp development, so it does perfectly address the Cardano DAO challenge.

确认你的人性

写评论

Replying to

Commenter gravatar
January 23, 2022

The proposer is planning on creating an open standard for on-chain voting through Plutus smart contracts. This fits the challenge very well as many dapps and protocols will be launching soon and governance of these protocols will require verifiable voting to change certain parameters/ parts of the dapp. I feel this will add a positive impact on the Cardano ecosystem as the core standard will be able to be re-used through many protocols- smoothing out the process of running a DAO.

确认你的人性

写评论

Replying to

Commenter gravatar
January 23, 2022

This proposal focuses on creating an open standard for on-chain voting through a Plutus smart contract that can be used by any DAO or dApp. It seems that this proposal is incomplete, since the goal/target, roadmap, KPIs, budget breakdown was not provided. As a result, potential impact can not be seen. Based on the given information, I strongly disagree with this proposal's impact, and would give it a score of 1.

确认你的人性

写评论

Replying to

Feasibility

2.4 / 5
7 评论

Given experience and plan presented is likely that this proposal will be implemented successfully

社区评论 (7)

Commenter gravatar
January 23, 2022

The proposal team is made up of several ex-EMURGO and IOHK employees with a record of applying and completing previous submissions on catalyst. This information makes the probability of the task proposed getting done. Although a lack of budget explanation and breakdown of how funds will be spent is concerning.

确认你的人性

写评论

Replying to

Commenter gravatar
January 23, 2022

Proposal itself is a bit light on actual details, but you don't have to dig much to see the sheer volume of material being contributed by the proposers. Perhaps overcommitment would be the only issue I would wonder about that would cause me not to give this item a higher rating, especially given the relatively low proposal amount.

确认你的人性

写评论

Replying to

Commenter gravatar
January 23, 2022

"The team is composed of well known ex-Emurgo and ex-IOHK employees who have been building the Cardano ecosystem for the past several years. I am really impressed with this experience of the team. With this experience, I have absolutely no doubt about the possibility of this idea if it is true. But I have yet to see propser offer any evidence for those personal experiences. This reduces confidence in the team's experience. I see this team also submitted another proposal in this challenge but like that proposal the lack of a specific plan is also a big barrier to verify the feasibility of the proposal."

确认你的人性

写评论

Replying to

Commenter gravatar
January 23, 2022

As proposer declared the teams have the necessary experience, but there aren't team members details and professional experience to imagine the project's success. The given metrics measure what the proposer wants to do, but the success of his actions is not defined. As mentioned above, the description of the solution is not well explained (e.g. how the funds will be spent, how the solution improve their customer experience, and so on…), so the progress of this proposal is not simple to assess. The metrics for the assessment isn't given, so it's impossible to assess what the proposer wants to do, but the success of his actions is not defined.

确认你的人性

写评论

Replying to

Commenter gravatar
January 23, 2022

The team claims to be ex-EMURGO and IOHK members that have been involved in Cardano development for years. Unfortunately, I cannot confirm this statement based on the information included in the proposal. No roadmap is included, and the description of the smartcontract lack a minimum level of details. Budget is limited, but no breakdown is provided. I understand that 100% of the budget is allocated to development. Based on the information I have, I neither agree or disagree that this proposal is likely to be implemented successfully.

确认你的人性

写评论

Replying to

Commenter gravatar
January 23, 2022

Since this proposal is not completed: almost not no profile description [although it is described as this team consist of "well-known ex-Emurgo and ex-IOHK employees"], not any roadmap or KPIs, and of course, the risk is not defined, so there is not much proof of feasibility to agree with. Therefore, based on the given information, I can not agree with this proposal's feasibility, and would give it a score of 2.

确认你的人性

写评论

Replying to

Commenter gravatar
January 23, 2022

A team made from ex-Emurgo and ex-IOHK employees and given that it should have a strong understanding of the ecosystem and what would make a good Plutus voting app. However the proposal would have been stronger if those key members were identified given that they are well known individuals, without having a way to validate those involved it's not clear to know who is behind this work. The release of a Github repo is also identified, however whose Github repo this would be.

确认你的人性

写评论

Replying to

Auditability

2.6 / 5
7 评论

Does the proposal provides sufficient information to assess and audit progress and completion?

社区评论 (7)

Commenter gravatar
January 23, 2022

A very rudimentary timeline of Q1 2022 is given for delivery of the proposal, a further breakdown of stages of production would give voters a clearer sense of key milestones that should be achieved by a certain date, and if any delays etc. will have an effect on the delivery date of Q1 2022. As stated above there is no real timeline given, although the proposal team AFAIK will be contactable through their social media.

确认你的人性

写评论

Replying to

Commenter gravatar
January 23, 2022

Seems like a single metric and an assessable timeline for delivery that can both be easily understood as being met.

确认你的人性

写评论

Replying to

Commenter gravatar
January 23, 2022

No plan is presented on what is actually going to be done, or why $15000 is needed to achieve it. Please come back with a plan for what you will actually implement,

确认你的人性

写评论

Replying to

Commenter gravatar
January 23, 2022

Roadmap and milestones (incl. time horizon) are not described and the budget's information provided is very poor and need to redefine because IMO is too small for the elapsed specified, and therefore say that it is not appropriate. There aren't KPI to identify the proposal goal, but only deliverables. There aren't more details how the budget is going to be spent, also I'm trying to discover attachment to deep dive the solution. Futhermore there aren't basic information to asses.

确认你的人性

写评论

Replying to

Commenter gravatar
January 23, 2022

The smartcontract development will be released on a github repository, which enable a good monitoring by the community of the progress. This proposal does not include a roadmap, I would recommend the proposer to elaborate the timeline and milestones description to increase project auditability.

确认你的人性

写评论

Replying to

Commenter gravatar
January 23, 2022

As mentioned, since there is no profile description and links for verification, doesn't have any roadmap or KPIs, the budget structure is not defined, and the risk is not defined], auditability is at a quite low level. Therefore, based on the given information, I can not agree with this proposal's auditability, and would give it a score of 2.

确认你的人性

写评论

Replying to

Commenter gravatar
January 23, 2022

The proposal aims to release a Git repo on github in Q1 of 2022. However many of the questions remain unanswered, such as what as what is the definition of success after 6 to 12 months. There are also aren't any clear indications as KPIs defining a successful project, which would be important in auditing progress and how the community can track progress. Progress could be of course tracked by commits in the Github repo however this information would need to be released and made publicly available.

确认你的人性

写评论

Replying to