Claim Your Account
Lets get you verified!
Great! You may close this page
after you've sent us the code on ideascale.
You will receive a confirmation once your account is validated
To verify your ownership of this profile,
please send a personal message to
Lido Nation
on ideascale and include the code above.
Do you already have a catalyst catalyst explorer or lido nation account?
How is this data calculated?
- A human at Lido Nation manually comb through proposals 2 identify core members of a group. People denoted as such are listed on the group page.
- For these core member, a script finds all the proposals for which they are the primary author & attribute that proposal to the group.
Despite our best efforts to maintain the accuracy of the information presented here, inconsistencies may exist.
Questions or feedback about this data?
Send us a messagePACE Claim Account How is this data calculated?
Bio
Projects Accelerating the Catalyst Ecosystem (PACE)
Community Reviews across funding rounds
Top of mind of PACE in Catalyst
most frequent words in proposal details
Challenges
The Team (3)
Members in Catalyst that have co-proposed with PACE. Individuals may not be employed at PACE. This is is is not representative of PACE's full team.
Follow PACE monthly project reports to have them delivered to your inbox, for all 15 projects.
Individual Projects can also be followed on project page.
Error following
Successfully subscribed. Watch your inbox!
We will check for new reports and deliver them directly in your email.
Your email will not be shared with any 3rd party or be used for anything else.
-
lovegrovegeorge
Web and mobile developer
-
Jakob Dickhaut
Research & analysis, management. Political Scientist and Business Psychologist with experience in strategic consulting
PACE Challenges (17)
Challenge: Products & Integrations
Challenge: Nurturing Ideas & Teams
Challenge: Community & Outreach
Challenge: Cardano Contributors
Challenge: Catalyst Contributors
Challenge: Governance & Identity
Challenge: Development & Node Operation
Challenge: Cardano Contributors League
Challenge: Cardano scaling solutions
Challenge: Community & Outreach
Challenge: Cardano Contributors
Challenge: Catalyst Contributors
Challenge: Development & Infrastructure
Challenge: Funding Categories Full Fund
Challenge: Governance & Identity
Challenge: Nurturing Ideas & Teams
Challenge: Products & Integrations
PACE Proposals (15)
Contributor Infrastructure Analysis
Solution: CatalystとCardanoのコントリビューターが使い始めることができる、最初の製品開発のワークフローとガバナンスプロセスを確立する。
Funding Categories Analysis
Solution: 課題設定プロセスの分析、カテゴリー分類のアプローチの比較、分析資料、資金調達カテゴリーの提案
PACE: Community credentials 2
Solution: 検証可能な証明書の導入、学習、使用のためのボトムズアップアプローチのためのコミュニティプロジェクトベースの学習演習
PACE: Skills credentials
Solution: LearnerShapeのスキル認証ソリューションを統合し、Atala PRISMを使用してコミュニティの評判を高める。
Progress and KPI reporting tool
Solution: 進捗状況やKPIレポートのためのレポーティングツールを作成し、フルオープンアクセスのデータを用いた代替報告プロセスとして利用できるようにする。
Catalyst Site: Collaborators list
Solution: プロポーザルに参加したい協力者の候補とそのスキルのリスト。
Catalyst Site:Improve proposal data
Solution: チームプロフィール情報の拡充・改善
Catalyst Site: Education resources
Solution: 使いやすいカレンダーページや、Catalystを知るためのリソースを集約したページを作成する。
Catalyst Site: Project tracking
Solution: プロジェクトのすべての資金調達履歴を提供し、プロジェクトと製品/ウェブサイトをリンクする。
PACE: Proposal completion reports
Solution: Provide a tool for completion reports to share the final execution result and success metrics achieved and share that to the community
PACE: Proposal progress updates
Solution: 既存の更新情報をインポートし、提案者が使用する進捗状況更新フォームを提供し、更新情報は提案データに添付されます。
PACE: Proposal media content
Solution: Tool for letting proposers or community members to attach media content to a given proposal both during and after the funding process
PACE: Community credentials
<p>There is a lack of tools/examples for community projects to easily integrate Atala Prism which reduces the speed of adoption</p>
PACE: Idea collaboration tool
<p>Quality proposals require ideas which have had sufficient thought, feedback and the right team to execute</p>
Funding Categories Analysis
Solution: Analysis on the challenge setting process, comparisons of categorisation approaches and desirable categorisation properties. This led to the suggestion of funding categories as an effective solution