The solution statement is sensible in light of the problem statement and both are clearly written. The challenge seeks to accelerate the development of dApps that "cover foundational Registry solutions," with an emphasis on the storage/retrieval of vital records on the blockchain. The proposed open-source application is not a decentralized application per se, but it is designed to extract legal and regulatory data from a blockchain (i.e., "legislation as code") and determine regulatory compliance or user eligibility. As a development economist, I agree that there is a very real need globally for such systems, as they would speed-up access to critical services and attenuate the impact of corruption (especially in developing nations). Such systems can also be used to leverage the value of property registries because zoning/building regulations could be applied against specific land parcels stored on a blockchain. My primary concern is the size of the proposal's budget relative to the total allotment of funds for this challenge ($90,000 of the available $600,000). That said, breaking the project into two distinct phases (development of MVP and subsequent testing) may not be feasible. Overall, I strongly agree that this proposal effectively addresses the challenge.

This proposal seeks to solve the problem of lack of open access to government regulations and legislation by coding government rules into an open platform which partially aligns with the challenge goals but is not a foundational registry solution listed in the challenge.
The proposal does a good job of articulating the value to Cardano ecosystem, and articulating how the solution scales to address future challenges. The proposal could be improved by providing key metrics and goals that closely align with the challenge, and either selecting another challenge (Miscellaneous) or more closely aligning with this challenge's goals.

This proposal is precisely the kind of thing we need, not just on Cardano but in this whole space. The more public goods, the better. Making regulation and legislation clear to those that wish to integrate their Dapps into the world and making the rules clear and open for all is a must-have to take advantage of our existing legal systems.

There is a clear description of the problem and solution here with identifiable measures of success based on the milestones. Key performance indicator's and what needs to be done is laid out clearly and on understandable grounds.

The proposal includes a roadmap, milestones, time horizon (very rough), a clear understandable description of the targeted problem and a detailed description of the solution that addresses the problem. To improve the proposal include metrics/KPIs to measure proposal success.

The proposed deliverables are very clear as are the KPIs provided by the team. The team does not address potential downside risk, but given the prior construction of the New Zealand legal database and the team's experience working with said data and the BetterRules project, failure to deliver a working product is unlikely. That said, there is greater uncertainty regarding the achievement of the KPIs, for which the downside risks are not addressed. Overall, I agree that this proposal provides sufficient information to assess its progress.