They claim that the proposal is full of challenges and readblocks, but the implementation time is only 3 months. I don't think the research and implementation of ideas can be done in just 1 month at each milestone. In addition, the milestones are not described so much that we can trust the proposal to be validated. Furthermore, the team's skill information is also not described. This reduces the reliability of the project. Because we have no basis to evaluate their capability.

This project is highly feasible. The plan and budget given seem to be very detailed and reasonable. The milestones are all achievable and the spending for each milestone is reasonable. The team members all have relevant knowledge and they also have experience in game creation and development. That adds to the viability of the project

The team has a working product available right now and auditable code available on Github. They have made strategic partnerships with others with previous successes in other catalyst rounds. The main coding of the platform is complete and only the blockchain integration and beta testing leads me to believe that the project is feasible within the time specified.

Based on the information provided, it looks like the team already has a blueprint for the milestones and tasks they plan to complete for the project. They have realistic expectations and a clear understanding of what is needed for the project to succeed. It's good to see that they plan to make Based on the information provided, it appears that the Treasure Chain team has drawn up a blueprint to develop an NFT game prototype and implement blockchain integration. They have set clear milestones for each phase of the project, with realistic timelines for handover. By open-sourcing some of their development tools, they aim to increase transparency and accountability and build trust with the community. It seems that the team has considered the potential challenges of the project and has made a contingency plan to address them. Overall, the project seems to have a high level of viability based on their capabilities, and the proposed method seems to be well structured to achieve the desired results. Based on these factors, I would give the project a feasibility/feasibility score of 4 out of 5, indicating that the team has a solid plan and the ability to execute the project with a high degree of trust and accountability.

The proposed Treasure Chain project aims to integrate smart contracts into the Godot game engine prototype, creating a dynamic platform that combines gaming, NFT marketplace, and social media functionalities. The feasibility of the proposal lies in its structured approach, clearly defined milestones, and specific goals.Milestone 1 focuses on team organization and administrative setup, ensuring smooth workflow and proper contract and payment arrangements. Milestone 2 involves integrating blockchain technology to mint NFTs with metadata, allowing the platform to connect with GameChanger Wallet. Milestone 3 involves translating game mechanics to blockchain interactions, embedding crucial tile information within NFT metadata. Milestone 4, the final acceptance milestone, deals with the implementation of multi-user gameplay and the potential open-sourcing of Godot to Cardano tools.the team also has a tracked record of working experience and they have the skills it takes to make it project success.The timeline appears well-structured, with a 3-month beta testing period starting in 2024 Q1, followed by a full product launch in Q2, and continuous monitoring and improvements in Q3. Marketing efforts to attract more users and generate revenue will be intensified in Success indicators include daily active users, registered unique wallets, transaction volume, and total revenue. Transparency will be maintained through public documentation of employee contracts, payment proofs, and tracked hours. Testnet ledger transactions and links to Cardanoscan will showcase successful minting of NFTs and metadata integration.

The proposal's ambition lies in surpassing existing Cardano NFT marketplaces in daily active users within six months of the official launch and outperforming all existing projects within a year. Achieving this goal will largely depend on the platform's usability, user experience, and attractiveness as a multifunctional gaming and NFT marketplace platform.

Overall, the project seems feasible and well-planned, with a clear roadmap and transparency measures. However, its ultimate success will rely heavily on how well the team executes each milestone, the quality of user experience, and effective marketing strategies.

For feasibility I have given you 4 stars. You already created a website with a small demo, so that is definitely much better than having absolutely nothing created when asking for funds. You have also done a decent job with your milestones and deliverables. Overall there is enough info in this section to make someone believe that you can complete the proposal. Feasibility is HIGH - this proposal element is GREAT

With a functioning prototype and ties to knowledgeable Cardano blockchain experts, the proposal demonstrates advancement and improvement. To evaluate the team's skills, it is crucial to be aware of their past work and background. An in-depth awareness of team members' responsibilities and prior experiences would be helpful when determining their talents. The functioning prototype created by Treasure Chain is a big accomplishment that shows their capacity to turn a concept into a usable product. Collaboration with GameChanger Wallet, a prominent player in the Cardano ecosystem, strengthens their position and provides access to valuable resources and expertise. The proposal outlines specific milestones, goals, and timelines for the project's development. However, additional clarification and concrete details on certain aspects would be beneficial. For example, further elaboration on the beta test launch and full product launch timelines would be helpful. The proposal also includes plans for monitoring and improvements after the full product launch, demonstrating the team's commitment to continuous enhancement and user satisfaction. Regarding funding, the proposal requests three months of funding, but it is essential to elaborate on specific funding requirements, utilization, and budget breakdowns. Transparent communication about financial planning ensures accountability and builds trust with potential investors. Establishing multiple channels of communication for community feedback and inquiries is commendable to address concerns and ensure transparency. In conclusion, while the proposal demonstrates progress with a working prototype and connections with skilled developers, providing more detailed information about the team's expertise, a clear budget breakdown, and further elaboration on milestones and timelines will strengthen the proposal's overall viability. Open communication and transparency will be key to building confidence and support for the Treasure Chain project within the Cardano community.

The goal of the project is explained but complex in nature. There is no clear distinction to start or begin with. The first goal upon funding is smart contract integration with the prototype. The release of beta begin user testing right after fund is released. The plan outlined to execute the task looks great and well-presented but somehow complex to understand. It does not follow pattern in my opinion and repetitive in most ways. The budget allocation is somehow expensive and needs to be cut down or reduce for a 3month project. The project milestone is neatly presented, however, lacks clarity and needs to be explained well to mind satisfaction. The experience of the proposer and his team members are enormous and boost investor confidence. Serving a position like founder, UI designer, product designer, animator, web developer, insurtech engineer shows how experienced the team members are. However, the information provided in the project milestone, plan, budget in my opinion cannot guarantee the feasibility of the project.

Treasure Chain already have their product prototype, and it is proven to be usable by their demonstration on their website (treasurechain.io). The team is also able to sufficiently provide evidence of their experience needed for this project to succeed. Regarding the technical aspect, however, I don’t see enough technical explanation needed for it to be integrated with Cardano blockchain. As you may know, Cardano’s smart-contract nature is different from Ethereum or the EVM world. How will it save its state with Cardano’s SC? Where will the asset (art pixels) be stored? Is it with IPFS or directly on the blockchain (which is very limited)? At the very least, explaining this technical aspect albeit not very comprehensive or in detail, will inform us the level of expertise of the team. With that being said, I have doubt that this team will successfully deliver the project within the said timeframe.

The feasibility of this proposal [“a modest amount to pay each team member $5,000 a month for 3 months” to continue working on the project] is relatively good. I think the team seems committed to the project. They are asking for three months of funding to continue developing their project. The team has already released a working prototype, so this is not a “we will only start building something, if you pay us” type of proposal. There is vision, there is commitment, there is a path ahead. Yet the team admits that the project is quite ambitious and they anticipate challenges and roadblocks. I do too. I see a LOT of challenges and roadblocks, hence it is important to keep in mind that this is – in my view - a very risky project for the Treasury. Some milestones should be better written. For example: “2023 Q4 - Begin smart contract integration with the Godot game engine prototype”. To begin something is not really a milestone in my book. It is a thing one does to feel better (“I started working on the project”). If resubmitting the proposal in Fund 11, tighten up the milestones language. For example, Milestone 2 states: “The first goal for blockchain integration into the Godot prototype is to allow the simple minting of an NFT on the platform.” My question here is – is the milestone “to allow” the minting … or to really mint it? The proof is in the mint. Milestone 3: “Research and implement how to translate the game mechanics to blockchain interactions.”. What do you specifically intend to research here and from where? The team expects to need more follow-up funding all throughout 2024 and 2025. However, the sources of this funding have not been stated. It’s a red flag if the project is planning to become a gamechanger for Cardano and blockchain games in general. Share the financial vision.

This project is very well written. The creation of a treasure chain using blockchain technology highlights the project and it is possible that this project will attract a lot of people to participate in the Cardano community. The reason is that people are easily attracted to new things and want to explore them. The proponent offers a very detailed and actionable solution and measure of success.

As the proposal said, a number of blockchain games have become popular. That means they are aware of the challenges may come when they decide to make a game recommendation. However, their description does not say anything about the game operating mechanism, or their game analysis will have any advantages to attract users compared to other games. The combination of NFT is not something too isolated, as most of the games currently on the ecosystem have this combination. Thus, to me, this idea was not at good level but nor poor one.

This project has a great benefit or potential for the development and growth the cardano ecosystem with the team interest in the development of an impact measurement system to grow cardano ecosystem.This proposal for Treasure Chain in the Cardano ecosystem aims to have a positive impact by offering a timeless blockchain game that appeals to a wider audience beyond crypto insiders. Unlike existing blockchain games, which often have limited gameplay, Treasure Chain combines NFT collectibles, video game assets, and fine art, allowing digital artists to earn a living by selling their works. The game's flexibility and collaborative nature, where users can arrange NFT artworks and create new art through modular Linkages, encourage engagement and creativity. By using crypto for all transactions, users can profit from their contributions, making it enticing for everyday gamers and artists to join the cultural event surrounding the game. the success rate and impact of this project on the Cardano ecosystem is very important the proposal appears promising to grow cardano ecosystem.The project's development will be transparent with publicly posted milestones on the Notion page, enabling community oversight. The number of users, growth rate will increase, and engagement of Cardano's unique active wallets with Treasure Chain will be critical indicators. Publicly available metrics from both testnet and mainnet ledgers, including active wallets, daily transactions, transaction volume, revenue, user profits, and content postings, will provide a comprehensive assessment of the project's success and its influence on the Cardano ecosystem.

From the information provided, it appears that the proposed solution is a game that combines NFT, Art, and crypto to create a unique platform with adaptable, customizable, and cooperative gameplay. The project aims to address the challenge of limited cultural relevance for blockchain games, while gaining more attention and adoption for Cardano by providing a hub for discovery and collaboration within the NFT ecosystem. The project team plans to measure success by meeting milestones, tracking user engagement and tracking transaction volumes, and comparing their metrics with similar platforms on Cardano and other blockchains. The project team also plans to share the results of their work through social media channels, the Catalyst committee and IOG communications, and show progress on their Notion and Github pages. Overall, the proposed solution has the potential to make a positive impact on the Cardano ecosystem by increasing interest in NFTs, blockchain art and games, and providing a platform for community collaboration. However, the success of the project will depend on its ability to attract and retain a substantial user base as well as its ability to maintain a high level of engagement and activity on the platform.

The proposal suggests the integration of the blockchain with their game/ marketplace, treasure chain. This enables novel ways to link NFTs together to form artistic landscapes. While cool and some artists may create interesting interactions, I don't believe that this proposal has the mass appeal that the team hopes.

I think you have done a decent job on this section and have given you 4 stars. When you are creating KPIs, it would be much more useful for you to define what your goal numebers are. so instead of saying "Number of daily transactions" You would say, Our target for number of daily transactions will be XXX. The Impact will be HIGH - this proposal element is GREAT

The proposal for Treasure Chain aims to enhance the Cardano ecosystem by establishing a unique NFT Art network. However, it lacks a clear and detailed explanation of its potential impact and benefits. The proposal mentions drawing attention and adoption to Cardano but lacks concrete evidence or measurable outcomes to support this claim. The lack of data leaves room for uncertainty. The proposal also fails to address the challenge of attracting a substantial number of users and artists to migrate to Cardano. It should offer a more comprehensive strategy to bridge the gap between crypto insiders and potential new participants. Key metrics, such as user count, transaction volume, and revenue generated, are outlined but lack specific benchmarks or desired values, making it challenging to evaluate the project's effectiveness. Communication through social media channels and engagement with the Catalyst Committee and IOG are mentioned, but a more comprehensive approach to community engagement and results dissemination is necessary. Overall, the proposal should provide more concrete and measurable explanations of how it will make a real difference in the Cardano ecosystem. Without a clearer and more detailed plan, it remains uncertain how Treasure Chain's game will achieve its objectives and contribute to the growth and adoption of Cardano.

The proposers are putting forward a proposal that would finance the creation of a new, simple game engine for users to create art or designs that can be turned int NFTs that take part in an NFT game. The proposers see a vision where this platform will serve to motivate creators and collectors to build worlds together. This is early days for the Treasure Chain project that sees itself as an art network. Interesting. The team states that “NFTs can act like a giant neural network of art”. I watched the intro video on the Demo on the Treasure Chain site. Interesting? Yes. Did it blow me away? No. Would I use it. Probably no. Would some of the kids I know probably use it? Probably no. The whitepaper is detailed. The 25 pages of explanations show that the team is passionate. The intro video shows the passion behind the project, so I am not minimizing the effort. However, at this moment in the Cardano project timeline, I think that this project – if worth it – should not rely on the Treasury as I am sceptical that it will have a positive effect on the Cardano ecosystem in the near future. In an ideal world the Treasury would stretch to all projects and all asks. However, this project in my view does not have the oooomph yet to create that synergistic effect for the treasury. My advice, if you are passionate about it, continue building it in your free time until Fund 11 when you might be able to show something more that can propel you into the funded project. Also, I would advise the team to be more objective if resubmitting the proposal in Fun 11 (if it is not funded in Fund 10).

Most online games are well placed with good graphics but lack user collaborative and customization. The treasure chain is an art network where users can assign rules about how their NFTs can interact with others. This will serve as a platform for creators and collectors to build worlds together. The proposal seeks to be unique by creating a user friendly game with adaptability, customization and collaboration. For this project, user of the game can assign rules about their location on the map, what art can be contained within other art and what other art can be combine with to form a new art. The proposal seeks to use the platform created to draw much attention and adaptation of other game developers, artists and enthusiasts to migrate to cardano blockchain. The innovation of treasure chain will be it adaptability and range of use cases which will be epicenter of the cardano NFT ecosystem. However, the impact on cardano ecosystem needs to be improved and amass huge numbers to partake in cardano community activities.

Treasure Chain is a project to create NFT games for creators with Cardano. The impact it will bring into the Cardano ecosystem is, of course, increase of adoption. When a game is created with blockchain, it will garner attention from the public, as with other game in the past i.e Axie Infinity. The unique aspect with this project is they combine 3 things with the success of NFTs, that is: digital collectibles, video game assets, and unique pieces of fine art. The innovation that Treasure chain wanted to create is its adaptability of range of use cases, where it behaves like a lobby or a space for different creator in NFTs space to interact with each other. All in all, I believe it’s a promising project if done correctly and meet all of the milestones.