Wada has put together a proposal that in my opinion will help to address the challenge of onboarding individuals to the Cardano blockchain.

Relation to personal qualifications: As a year-long activist in both party-politics and non-party related political (grassroots) groups I know how important decentralised communities and governance processes are for democratic and economic empowerment. DAOs are a powerful tool in this respect. I want to bring in my personal knowledge and experience on various governance models into action by assessing proposals in this challenge. Having that importat actor in the catalyst network form a DAO network can surely only be beneficial for the Cardano ecosystem, so this proposal fits very well into the challenge setting. The key metrics and goals of the proposal align excellently with the outlined challenge settings. Since WADA is a great multiplicator and keeps establishing, it can sure be said that the proposal is able to scale to address future challenges.

The WadaDao addresses the challenge Dao loves Cardano well by fusing organizational standards into Dao model like treasury management, voting mechanism and governance incentives. It has some collaboration with expert in AI like Singularity net and Phoetrek.

The idea is to address the lack of customizable tools for managing treasury, voting, organization and multilateral agreements. The solution to validate quadratic voting and other voting models, incorporate known organizational standards into DAO models, design a distributed treasury system. I completely agree with this idea, this is necessary and extensible for decentralized projects that develop on the ecosystem. However, I wonder if this custom tool is open source and encourages developers to participate in the build.

I personally think the information presented is a sufficient start point to audit their initiative and I am hopeful that as the initiative develops they will implement whatever necessary scaling solutions are required to ensure proper audit ability as it grows.

Well-defined, detailed metrics and an auditable roadmap are presented that define the success of the proposal. A clear, understandable problem description is accompanied by a very detailed, auditable description of a solution.

The budget information is unclear as some items like team fee and developer motivation etc. are not defined. The main promise in KPIs is the white paper but the implementation success in % haven't been defined and hence the voter could not be very confident compared to the budget that they would spend on the proposal.

The proponent mentioned more than 9 services to be built, it would be even better when the roadmap to build the DAO is fully informed with measurable KPIs. There have been many DAOs developed on other ecosystems and have been successful, you can refer to it to get more information about the project's risks and challenges from which to have appropriate solutions for development.