I see that you do not make a detailed table of tasks and plans. You use the progress of previously received grants to include in the project. You need to improve and change more. In general, there is no clear weekly and monthly plan, no specific amount to be used for each part of the work. Hope you guys will do better in the next projects.

The team, Milkomeda, and dcSpark, have a strong Cardano track record, inspiring trust and accountability. Their well-planned milestones, like releasing specifications and completing the Milkomeda hardfork, make the proposal technically feasible. However, the lack of details about sharing project outputs may pose challenges, particularly for newcomers to the community. Nonetheless, the team's expertise gives confidence in the project's successful implementation, making the proposed approach feasible

It goes without saying this team will delivered on this proposal given their background and the milestones listed, it's sensible to conclude that this will be feasible and delivered to the cardano ecosystem, if successfully funded.

The proposer did a lovely job by providing names of team members with their relevance links for reference who will help in the project execution and I strongly believe they have the potential and experience per their reference since they are commercial members in the cardano community, have the desire skills and knowledge to help in the execution of the project if they would be granted fund's to execute their project. Also, the team also did well by providing details breakdown milestone with each tasks and intended outcome and expected timeline of 4 months , that is,1.Public documentation.2.Announcement.3.Audit release.4.Announcements of integrations, which I strongly believe it's achievable should they be funded.

The proposer did a very marvelous job by placing it in its right challenge, they effectively addressed the precise challenge and clearly provide solution to it which is stated in the proposal that;This will help adoption of sidechains and L2s in the Cardano ecosystem which gives more power to developers to create custom environments for their specific needs without having to worry about losing adoption because of it should they be funded. Also, the proposal is a game changing project which is out to bring values and impact to cardano ecosystem by its capturing some important key metrics under the compaign brief showing how it will bring impact such as; Number wrapped smart contract calls made, Number of dApps that integrate wrapped smart contracts should they be funded and I strongly believe they would do a wonderful job if they would be granted fund's to execute their project.

I STRONGLY agree with the premise of this proposal that users do not want to manage and use several wallets. This proposal that aims to integrate sidechain functionality into our existing wallets can only be described as extremely high impact, not just to the end user, but to dapps themselves.

• I agree with your project idea. However, the description of the project's output and output sharing plan is described that looking at the contents of both linked documents I think you should leave the link in that answer.

The proposal introduces Wrapped Smart Contracts to boost sidechain and Layer 2 (L2) adoption in Cardano. This system allows direct calls to Milkomeda smart contracts from Cardano wallets without extra wallet development. Benefits include increased wrapped smart contract calls and dApp integrations, empowering developers to build on sidechains and L2s seamlessly. It simplifies user onboarding into the ecosystem, reducing barriers and promoting adoption. Overall, the proposal effectively addresses the challenge, providing valuable benefits to the Cardano ecosystem