I think the suggestion has summed up my thoughts, so I'll leave the microphone to the suggestion team:. Current methods used to ensure transparency of donor-NGO relationships are time-consuming and prone to breaches leading to poor fund management and embezzlement without any stakeholders. which agency is responsible. The

• Add tags… adoption automation blockchain cooperation

This is only the first step, but an important one. " Current methods are used to ensure transparency of donor relationships Conduct research on working processes between donors and NGOs to configure the user journey for the CNGO platform and how it can become a DAO ecosystem. Describe the challenge that requires creating working groups and becoming more involved in discussions Team with 10 years of solid experience in sales, marketing, auditing, social work and research. Cardano's values ​​align with our beliefs, especially in terms of governance and anti-corruption by benefiting from the transparency blockchain technology provides.

NGOs are essential to bringing about change in underdeveloped nations; frequently, they are the ones that hold the government and industry accountable and ensure that progress is being made in the right direction. However, in the present day's world of Ponzi schemes and scams, many NGOs are either being defrauded of the intended donations or are unable to achieve their objectives. In order to have a prolonged involvement of NGOs and their volunteers in developing nations, a transparent method to keep this in check is unquestionably required. The right DAO can significantly increase the impact that NGOs may have on society by keeping them on course and overseeing how monies generated are used. The proposer attempts to find the best possible solution to this problem, and this proposal is an auxiliary project that is concentrated on the research portion while another proposal is made by the team from the perspective of implementation. The author also appears to have a solid answer for each danger involved and is well aware of the potential impact his concept could have. If this proposal is funded, together with its other proposal, it might significantly improve the chain. However, just this suggestion might provide a plethora of new options for programmers engaged in NGO tracking.

This proposal addresses a very critical real world challenge. There are many times donors wholeheartedly release huge sums of money to be used to support victims of disaster or people in need. But due to the fact that there are no accurate systems in place to check accountability, NGOs or sometimes local community leaders misuse funds, not for the intended purposes. This disrupts trust of donors for NGOs and also affect intended recipients. The proposers intend to do a thorough research and use the findings to create a DAO for NGOs so that they operate on Blockchain. This means that every donation, spending, and all activities including decision making processes are captures on the Blockchain and donors will have access to every information they need to have on their donations. This will increase transparency and effectiveness in delivery. Intended beneficiaries of donations will not be affected by inefficiencies in centralized NGO operations. DAOs on the Cardano Blockchain will lead to increased participation and adoption of Cardano by many. There will also be possible increase in project catalyst participation.

This proposal is definitely Cardano's style – proposing research to find a way to make Non-Government Organizations (NGOs) more accountable and fraud-resistant. This idea makes strides toward the un-victimization of people that Cardano strives for. They are starting out on this road conducting interviews with donors and researching the current centralized method of maintaining an NGO. They key metrics of this proposal align with the challenge setting and the proposal is for short-term research but the team has another proposal to further build out a daApp and scale. The proposal includes a roadmap and a long-term (2 years) goal to build a tool to verify eligibility of NGOS and record their behavior on the platform. Ultimately, they would like to “bridge the gap” between NGOs and DAO with an open-source tool. Embarking on this research journey excites me and I find the ask reasonable, rated 5 stars.

This proposal if successful could provide a model for NGO operations from a DAO structure, which has been done on other chains (e.g. Endaoment on Ethereum or Angel Protocol former on Terra), but has yet to have a prominent model on Cardano (to my knowledge). The problem to be addressed here –using a DAO framework to provide transparency to donor/NGO relations is clear and concise, fits within the challenge framework, and could potential provide positive impact on the Cardano ecosystem.

Bridging the gap between NGOs and DAO will have beneficial effect on Cardano. This proposal is focused on investigation and documentation of needs and requirements and NGOs and how they can include DAOs in their operations. The results of research will be published. Results of this proposal can be used to make Cardano a better environment for DAOs, publications can be considered a tool that can be used by the community.

I would recommend proponents to work on the clarity of this proposal and resubmit. The focus must be on defining what the problem is, and a logical solution to the problem, and a related title. In my mind, a reasonable solution to the stated problem would be to create templates for trust registries or templates for reusable functionality for use by trust registries. Roadmap to our broader vision After the initial launch, we plan to release continuous updates of the platform where NGOs/vendors will be integrated to optimize monitoring. expenditures by NGOs. When I saw the title of the proposal, I thought it would provide a registry The success of this project meant that we answered all the research questions and performed a concluding trial with selected NGOs and donors. After This is a brand new proposal The impact of working to achieve any SDG has a significant impact on community development. Two main features of SDGs a

The proposal's objectives are clearly stated, quantifiable, and based on the clear road map in front of us. The author mentions that the community can use the monthly reports and regular community meetings (perhaps over Discord) to monitor development. The metrics would play a significant role in ensuring that non-governmental organizations operate under the supervision and without corruption because they are in line with the requirements of the challenge. The team adds that achieving a clear grasp of how to include a DAO with NGOs and how to ensure that both are advantageous would be the ultimate triumph. However, I believe that the team could have done a better job of giving us actionable metrics to track their research progress, through some audio-video proofs rather than waiting for a UI to publish those, and that the author could have taken a much wider scenario into consideration when evaluating the findings while writing the success metrics rather than just the DAO-NGO integration aspect. Given that this is a brand-new project and that there is information missing in minuscule auditability areas, I would give this section a 4 out of 5.

The key performance indicators for progress tracking are listed with clarity. Success metrics have been listed as well. The timelines given will enable the community to receive progress report for auditing. I think the proposal presentation is simple and clear enough.

A semi-detailed roadmap is provided for short term plan (through September 2022). Would like to see more specifics on the plan for September 2022. Broader vision is also addressed, showing that this is the first step in a much longer journey. Noted that the beta version of the website is already online and linked to the proposal. The team has listed 3 measurable and time-specified goals to achieve over 3 months and proposal also states that they will be using a KPI tracker aligned with the project plan. I would like to see the KPI tracker, or an example of it in the proposal. The determining criteria for project success is clear and shows how this research and gathering of information will contribute to solving the stated problem. The proposal states that progress reports will be shared with the Cardano community in monthly meetings. I would like to see where and how these meetings plan to be publicized in the proposal. Rated 3 stars for Auditability.

The project appears to the sufficiently auditable given it will a report. However the tean mentions "run[ning] a conclusive experiment with the selected NGOs and Donors" but it's nowhere else mentioned in the proposal so it's unclear what that would entail.

KPIs are given, but they seem to lack quantities and more details. The impact section suggested more steps that would need to be tracked. The success is well defined. Publication of results should be included, to comply with the goals of the challenge (building tools and platforms)