The NFT technology applies well to the context of art. The 3D art is growing therefore it is important to regulate it. The 3D printer are also digital addicted by definition and this is why I like this Proposal. It could work very well.

This proposal addresses the challenge quite well also in the context of all 3D designs and visualisations that requires physical realisation. The marketplace recommended to serve as some kind of "certification" hub as well. Storing of the native files - IPFS or centralised?

The proposal indeed suggests a novel and interesting use-case, which bridges the gap between the real and the digital world in the context of 3d-printed assets. This novel idea opens up new business opportunities, where creators of 3d models can be rewarded for their efforts and can sell either their models or limited supplies of their creations. This has the potential to attract users from a new niche, and opens the door to exploration of how the blockchain interacts with real-world assets. The proposal includes both technical objectives as well as marketing ones, which is essential for adoption, and a great plus to this proposal.

The proposal attempts to merge two growing markets, NFTs markets and 3D printable models. As a member of the 3D printing community I am personally excited for a dApp which allows creators to monetize and distribute 3D models. The proposal offers a unique approach to hosting 3D model repositories and a mechanism for creators to easily craft and monetize their work. This proposal builds off the current NFT craze to access a, relatively, untapped market for the 3D printing community. The proposed dApp shows promise to attract people with 3D printers to the Cardano ecosystem.

This is a very promising proposal. It has a significant potential to grow cardano's user-base, network-utility and network-value. The application suite proposed is a fantastic combination of the NFT concept and the cardano network and has all the necessary requirements to attract all the 3D printing enthusiasts. It has clear and measurable goals, the budget is pretty reasonable and it seems to have the capacity to attract the community interest and engagement. The plan set out is quite clear on how they plan to add value to the cardano ecosystem and the milestones are aligned with the objectives of the campaign.

The proposal is offering protection to Intellectual Property in 3D printing through NFT. However, it goes more in the direction of making 3D printing less accessible and less democratic. It's of course important to protect Intellectual Property and give value to the work done by 3D makers. However, controlling every piece printed does not counter the problem of piracy (as the NFT and art market have proved s far) and moves the market to more oligarchic models. Therefore, it is questionable that the proposal effectively addresses the challenge and will disrupt the 3D printing market.

This proposal is a very unique way to approach the concept of a NFT, and utilizes the blockchain issued NFT to tie the digital world to the physical, or vice versa. This makes blockchain the "glue" of our economy. 3D printing is an obvious next step in manufacturing as far as physical products goes, and NFTs will be a large part of this space.

I think this is a fantastic idea to bridge and start NFT marketplace. Relevant experience is detailed and the roadmaps has great metrics.

Although metrics quite clear - would be good to releasd basic functionality after month 2.5 as value gap between month 1 and 4 too big -especially out of blocks. As much as youtube can help with marketing, selling and education - metrics and effort should be added on streamlining the core processes of ensuring that the essence of the challenge is optimised and made user friendly.

The information provided is explained well but it is missing the identification of KPI that allow us to verify the status update of the proposal.

My main concern is that the proposers do not address risks and challenges - 3d printing is not always an exact science, and surely a lot of details with how the real asset interacts with the blockchain element will need to be tweaked. Regardless, the proposal proposes measurable, specific goals on the tech and marketing roadmap.

Much of the milestones offered by the proposal are definitive and can be used to measure the progress of the team. Hopefully the team behind this proposal will make the milestone data available to everyone.

The proposal seems to have a well defined metrics for measuring their success. I believe it will be very possible to audit the progress and success of the proposal.

The information provided is sufficient to audit the progress of the team. Even though it is not extremely detailed about the entire roadmap, there's a good amount of milestones with clear metrics for each of them. A good idea would be to prepare some presentations mid-journey to show how current progress is compared to what was planned. But again, the KPIs are very clear and aligned with the definition of success which in turn presents a good understanding of the targeted problem.

The proposal is well structured and detailed in a way that the progress can be audited. However, the required budget is not reasonable. In special, because it is an audacious task to build the entire platform with 5000 active users, in one year and in a team of two persons. It would be too risk to invest such amount of money, considering the chances of failing and delays.

The road map is incredibly well laid out, thoughtful and easy to measure quantitatively in plain terms with no ambiguity. Voters should feel comforted knowing this will be clear as day weather the team succeeded or not.

The overall plan seams well established, the funds are reasonable per intended use and the timeline well designed.