Learning through applications is becoming increasingly popular, particularly among young people, due to their attractive design, wide range of topics, and responsiveness, such as Kahoot! - an application ranked among the top 15 in the Top 15 Largest EdTech Companies, according to the proposer mentioned in the article. Therefore, building an e-Learning platform on Cardano by staking ADA is obvious, the benefits it brings to the ecosystem will absolutely happen. It can be seen that the students will take a quiz to assess what they have learned by betting on the ADA that was given at the start. If users pass the test, they will receive an ADA number; otherwise, it will be returned to the content creators. This not only allows students to review their knowledge while earning money, but it also allows the creators of the Ev-MCQ to profit from the exercises they provide. Furthermore, the proposer attaches the BOUNDER user manual, which has a rather unique feature in that it costs a 10% bet if the student wants to find a hint. This not only gets students closer to the correct answer, but it also motivates students to study harder if they don't want to waste 10% of their valuable time. However, I disagree with the proposal's intended solutions to the challenges. Aside from finding human resources to write the code and attracting users, the proposer must also address one issue: fraud. This is a common occurrence, especially with online testing. What will the proposer do if, while taking the test, the user uses the material to find the correct answer or asks for help from others rather than reviewing it himself?

"Online education is widely used today. However, there are some significant drawbacks when adopting e-learning that should be taken into account, like low motivation, easy distraction, low-quality courses, etc. The Internet occasionally distracts me as well. I do support the concept of designing an engaging and dynamic learning platform. The proposers described quite clearly how the system (BOUNDER) works. Three main elements that form this system include quiz betting, ease-to-use tools, payment for content creators. From the student perspective, basically for each question they receive a certain amount of money (ADA) when they answer right; and lose money when answering wrong. This form of betting motivates students to really understand the knowledge thus gain confidence of betting to obtain the rewards. From the content creator perspective (those who create questions e.g., teacher), they receive passive income from the content created when students bet/answers through BOUNDER. In terms of the risks, apart from the human resource problem, I just want to ask if there were other blockchain-based quizzes like this? This is the risk from competitors, so what are the unique points that this platform offers? If the system is successful, Cardano will draw great attractions to students and teachers, thus boosting the number of users. This solution is well aligned with the challenge. "

The proposal seeks to build an easy and fun user-generated multiple-choice quiz product in the style of Kahoot, providing users who can be students or teachers the chance to learn and earn at the same time. The proposer adds the Evidential Multiple Choice Question (Ev-MCQ) to challenge the confidence of the users in each answer on BOUNCER. This is a quite reasonable approach to deal with the downside of MCQ (multiple choices question) and the pain point of students/teacher/educators that use this testing method. So, the proposer addresses the product features, target audience and impacts in detail, making the proposed solution clear and easy to understand. As a web3 competitor of Kahoot- an extremely popular gamification tool - this easy and interesting e-learning project will bring more users to the Cardano community, thus proving that’s it well aligned with the challenge. In addition, the proposal elaborates on the risk it might need to deal with, i.e. the difficulty in finding and affording suitable team members with Haskell expertise; and then it presents a reasonable solution. This part is really well-written.

The proposers have described a fascinating solution to many of the aspects within this Dapps, Products & Integrations challenge. Their solution introduces a new product that hopes to overcome current centralized providers and teach users about crypto content. I thoroughly appreciate and applaud them on the clear product statement and impact explanations. The proposer and team aim to design, test and release ‘BOUNDER’ an e-learning quiz and betting game that will be part of a larger DAO e-learning platform. Their premise is that ‘learn to earn’ is an effective model that hasn;t been widely adapted but can be easily implemented within the Cardano ecosystem. They hope to engage users in a ‘Kahoot like’ multiple choice quiz system, but with the added incentive of being able to wager on your success answering questions. The final connection is that they eventually plan to make it open source and allow user generated quizzes - not just initial offerings that empower users to learn about crypto and Cardano. I was an early adopter of Kahoot as an educator and ICT integration facilitator working in schools for many years. With young students the engagement factor, competitiveness and adaptability to customize the questions, made it an ideal supplement to teaching. For adults, BOUNDER with the additional aspect of ‘earn to learn,’ leads me to believe that the proposal has a very strong impact for the Cardano community and world at large. Through creating an easy tool to bring awareness and more onboarding of non-crypto users to the Cardano platform, this proposal clearly aligns with the stated challenge. Overall, the clearly explained rationale and description of an adaption of a highly effective product allow me to give this proposal a 5 star rating for impact.

"The proposal is about building an ""earn to learn"" application on Cardano platform to promote learners and evaluators's work, This application's theory based on a research paper which intends to improve the classical Multiple Choice Question (MCQ) method in the student evaluation process. The new method is called Evidential MCQ (Ev-MCQ). Through this method, student's quality is assessed more accurately and, notably, the results of Ev-MCQ test can be automatically processed by Artificial Intelligence so it saves a lot of time and resources. This product can be implemented as a stand-alone system or as one of the main parts in the Distributed E-Learning Platform project. A sustainable economic model is created inside the product, including: (1) An initial fund contributed by parents, teachers,…; (2) The ADA top-up from the learners for betting; (3) Both students and material creators can earn ADA by doing test well and producing quality tests, respectively. The success of this project might have big positive impacts on Cardano platform, such as attracting more users and developers to Cardano, raising awareness about the advantages of blockchain in general and Cardano in particular. Therefore, I believe the purpose of the project has matched with this Challenge' goals. In terms of risk management, the project team has mentioned only one issue that can jeopardize the product development. I can see another serious issue. Some countries completely ban or have very strict regulations on all forms of betting or gambling, especially with children. Therefore, I suggest that the project team should carefully study the laws in any countries before they implement the product and consider replacing the word ""bet"" with a more friendly word and put a minimum ages on users placing bets.

Right off the bat, I must admit that I’m genuinely intrigued with the idea behind this proposal, as the proposer offers quite a correct depiction of the current difficulties in E-Learning that I believe even the most famous E-Learning platforms have yet to be able to solve thoroughly. And this project aims to do just that, while serving multiple purposes that benefit all the participating parties. Diving deeper into the details, the proposers aim to create a Learn-to-Earn educational platform that features betting on quizzes. Yes, that may sound really odd, but the further the proposal describes the project, the more sense it makes. As the proposal states, Multiple Choice Question (MCQ) is still an effective method to evaluate one’s knowledge and grasp of a particular topic, subject or field. However, it can sometimes be inaccurate to measure exactly the degree of one’s comprehension. Therefore, comes the new form of MCQ, called Evidential Multiple Choice Question (Ev-MCQ), that the team will be featuring heavily in this project. The proposal has enclosed a white paper that explains deeply what Ev-MCQ, at the same time informing us the capability of conducting a more precise and rigorous assessment of one’s learning process. In addition to Ev-MCQ, the BOUNDER platform sports a betting mechanism that would encourage students and participants to study everything carefully if they want to earn money or not to lose any. To exhibit the features and functions of the project more closely, the team has given quite an illustrative visualization of what goes on during normal use, followed by comprehensible descriptive words. At the beginning of the “test”, each participant will be granted a designated amount of ADAs from the platform, which will be used to “bet” on the answer believed to be correct. If users are wondering between 2 answers, they can bet on both. If they bet on the right answer, they shall keep the money. Otherwise, they lose it. If they find themselves unable to answer a question, they can choose to skip to the next one with a little penalty of a small amount of ADA taken away, and the same thing also happens if they ask for hints. All the lost ADAs will be sent to the evaluators/teachers/tutors who have helped create the knowledge-scrutinizing Ev-MCQs as a way of saying “thank you for your contribution”. When users have completed the test, the remaining amount of ADAs will be able to transfer to their wallet for cashing out. I believe that BOUNDER will succeed in achieving what they set out to do, which is incentivizing learners, both off and on-chain, to take part in serious learning in exchange for some profit. And I do agree with the proposers’ statement that this project will be highly appreciated in developing countries, as it not only motivates students to bring in their A-game, but can also be a steady source of income for them. All to make learning more fun, engaging and rewarding. Furthermore, BOUNDER may also have the potential to be a global hit, due to the fact that even though we have already had a handful of platforms that serve the same educational purposes, none of them offers a monetizing feature like BOUNDER. And It’s also safe to say that BOUNDER is the first of its kind, since according to the proposer, if I may quote directly from the proposal, “A web3 competitor of Kahoot doesn't exist yet. Let's make it on Cardano.” Nevertheless, I have spotted a small flaw in an otherwise near perfect presentation. This section of the proposal still lacks the key metrics needed to measure the different states of success and achievements of the project in the foreseeable future, and how those success and achievements translate to the benefits designated for Cardano. Therefore, I would suggest the proposer supplement those important details. As for the possible risks and obstacles that may stand in the way of the project finalization, the one that the team fears is also the one commonly found in the crypto world, human resources. Specifically, Haskell/Plutus coding is somewhat of an advanced level of programming, hence there are only few developers who are actually capable or familiar with the coding, and for that reason, they charge quite an amount of fees as well. Therefore, the team plans to entitle them with ownership of their contributions to the project, in addition to payments, which I believe should be enticing enough for them to remain onboard. And to ensure a positive outcome of customer adoption, the team will build a website that acts as not only a beta testing platform but also the place to keep pace with the project, two birds with one stone indeed. And by the way, I love the addition of the memes. I always appreciate hilarious ones that depict exactly the context or situation in which they are being used. Still, for the sake of being professional, It’s advisable to leave them out.

A Cardano multiple choice quiz game with user generated questions and ADA rewards - we have the perfect mass adoption tool! This is definitely a very exciting proposal even judging it based on the elevator pitch.

As with every excellent Cardano project, there is a research paper behind this one too, and it has to do with evidential multiple choice questions that use belief theory and allow players to state their answers in an imprecise way. There is of course a more detailed explanation behind, but the key takeaway is that this model allows for better data to be gathered and can increase knowledge levels, adoption rates and it can even aim for financial sustainability, although at the beginning it will have to rely on external sources to pay the game rewards.

If this proposal turns into an interactive game in which players get to test their knowledge of Cardano and get a chance to win some rewards, it’s definitely an excellent value proposition and a very good fit with the challenge.

I like the idea of proposals the promote education within the Cardano community. I think that education is one of the most lacked principles in the whole Crypto industry. I know of lots of people who have purchased Crypto assets, but they have no idea what they do. They are intrigued by the price fluctuation and the idea of making quick money. However, Cardano has a focus on education for all community members. I write about this because I appreciate this proposal wants to create a project that can have an engaging effect on community members and promote education while doing so. The solution proposed to combat the current challenge of lack of education in the ecosystem. The proposed idea is to create a product similar to Kahoot that will quiz users on certain topics and to reward the users when they answer correctly. This has the potential to have a positive impact on all Cardano users because it will give more people opportunities to learn about Cardano and how the blockchain works. Something that can be considered is how the team plans to grow a community that is excited for this proposal. For these reasons, I give this section of the proposal 4 out of 5 stars.

This is a very interesting and unique proposition. It builds an open source engine, users can bet ADA on each question and content creators get paid accordingly. In addition, it is the best method for accurately detecting user knowledge, which has a monetization impact on a whole new ecosystem. I have worked with many programs that use kahoot, and I have found them to be very effective. Building a "clone" of kahoot on Cardano will certainly have great potential, bringing great value to the community. With the above reasons, I believe this project will effectively solve the challenge.

This is a new and very interesting idea, setting up a toolkit that includes learning content (Like Kahoot) about Cardano where participants can both learn about Cardano and also learn about Cardano. can both make money from solving the puzzles it poses. This, in turn, stimulates the participants' exploration. Because as we all know, engaging in e-learning content is difficult because it is quite dry and not fun. This proposal is looking for support to build BOUNDER (https://github.com/e-Learning-DAO/BOUNDER), and it will be open-source love the idea of ​​this proposal, per participant Participants will be given a small budget after which the user is challenged by a wagering process for each answer. For each correct answer, they will be rewarded and vice versa, if they are wrong, their budget will be deducted (if students don't want to lose money, they must study seriously). All of this ADA is deducted from the existing budget, but once it is spent, the student can top up the ADA to continue testing. This is how BOUNDER can become profitable and sustainable. The problem and solution statement presented by the proponent is clear and consistent with the spirit of the challenge

The goal-setting success like Kahoot! of the proposer is not always a bad thing, because it will encourage the proposal to develop as desired and even surpass the opponent. It is clear that the author's goal is to provide a learning environment for students that will allow them and teachers to earn more money from the content created, and I completely agree. However, the development progress of the author's proposal is still not very good and does not meet all of the required requirements. To assist investors in keeping a close eye on what will be done in the proposal, the author should provide specific milestones for each development phase.

This is an open-source solution; thus, the project will be audited by GitHub commits, pull requests, and bug tracking. The Sustainable Development Goals Rating was used here, since the project was related to quality education. However, to improve the project auditability, I still think this project needs some other KPIs/metrics such as numbers of users, teachers, MCQs, ADAs earned from learning, etc. The proposers just said they would create the website containing their progress in the near future.

With the use of BOUNDER, an open-source solution, the audibility is guaranteed by definition through GitHub commits, pull requests, and bug tracking. This is a good point to guarantee the clarity of the project. However, I’m not quite sure about the “website containing information about the progress and the status of the development” that the proposer is going to build. I guess more details like numbers of users, scores and time spent of each user, etc. needed to be added here to better measure the learning/betting progress and development. Things are the same for the success criteria of the project. No specific KPIs for the new use cases that will be attracted to the Cardano community. As for the income that a teacher will earn as a content creator, there should also be some specific income ranges provided in order to ensure a higher level of the project auditability.

The product development phase aligned with the action plan will be open to those interested via Github commits, pull requests and bug tracking. The proposers also plan to create a website with progress information similar to one they already have from developing an e-Learning DAO. The financial monitoring and expenditure appears to be included along with the Github information, however, it would be beneficial for this to be specifically mentioned in the proposal. The main red flag I see in terms of auditability is in regards to the ‘earning’ phase of the product. It may be my lack of understanding, however, I can’t see in the flow of the product where the ‘money’ is coming in. For example, teachers are paid to develop content, students don’t pay to play, they receive an ADA budget at the start and evaluators receive payment. The only line that describes some input is ‘the initial budget can come from different sources: patrons, sponsors, employers, parents, and students financially independent.’ From this initial input, is the system supposed to be self funded and perpetual, even with members able to cash out their earnings? I’d like to see this detail, including specific amounts imagined in the financial auditability section, as without this piece, the entire ‘learn to earn’ premise can be disregarded. Overall, the team provides a solid list of steps they will take to prove their accountability, with the only missing piece being the explanation around the input funds. I rate this auditability section 4 stars.

The proposers commit to publish the source code to Github and create a website for progress reports so that the community can track and update all the work of the development team. However, apart from a short description of how the future success looks like, specific KPIs for all the tasks of this project are missing. Therefore, it could be hard for community to measure the success of this proposal.

As mentioned in the Impact section, the team will be creating a dedicated website that both acts as an experimenting platform and also the place for updates and news of the project, which should offer a good level of auditability to the followers. And also, there will be GitHub ticket requests made available as bounties to encourage more people to join in. The desirable success for this project would of course mean it being the source of passive income for all participants, teachers and students alike, and also a good way to pick up knowledge. The SDGs also aim at the exact same thing, only this time obviously the outcome would scale up dramatically over time and hopefully reach a dominant preference on the market. All of them evidently fit within the scope that this Dapps, Products and Integrations challenge has set out. However, I must point out one critical detail that the proposal has failed to mention, which is the benefits and/or profits that Cardano can expect to reap from the success of the project. I would suggest that the proposer quickly supplement that detail since it plays a pivotal role in this standard.

Bounder (the name of the game) will be open source and hence the code will be visible on github and this will ensure full auditability by the community. The team also promises to create a dedicated web page to track the progress. An extra point is the fact that the project will be part of a wider e-learning DAO, and we can be reasonably sure that the team members are used to an open working environment, sharing ideas as well as making their work fully transparent. The proposers also make an excellent case of how success should look like. First, it would position itself as the first web3 version of Kahoot, the very popular quiz game. Second, success will be achieved when the game will be able to pay passive rewards to the teachers (creators of quiz questions) every time a user plays the game. An excellent philosophy and good prospects for full auditability. Five stars again.

Overall, the proposal includes a lot of information throughout the whole plan to implement their project. It is important to note the specific metrics that were included in their roadmap and budget breakdown. By including this, it allows for supporters of this proposal to keep up to date and help check in with the team after each milestone to help keep them accountable to their roadmap. This is important because it will allow for the team to be transparent with the community. This concept builds trust between the team and community, and ultimately helps determine the likelihood of success for this proposal. I think that it is a great idea and that creating a Kahoot like project that focuses on Crypto education will be really important. Especially considering that the community will flourish next bull market. For these reasons, I give this section 4 out of 5 stars. I suggest implementing the given suggestions of including how the team plans to grow the community. The most important part is ensuring that this project will have enough traction to make the requested funds useful.

Information is provided sufficiently, people can rely on it to evaluate the success of this project. In addition to my comments in the previous section. I have seen your enthusiasm and diligence in this project, by providing a wireframe, activity profile, it helps me visualize the project clearly. Besides, you have also identified the criteria to evaluate the progress and success of the project, which is very necessary. However, I think I should add a few more figures. Here I have a few examples that might help you: the number of questions built per month was 2000, the number of content creators increased by 20 per month,… . This will greatly help everyone in monitoring and evaluation. This is a very good idea. If successfully implemented, it will certainly bring great value to many stakeholders: allowing participants to test their knowledge of blockchain and Cardano, helping content creators get paid real money. to help the Cardano ecosystem develop in a positive direction. In the future, I hope to participate in the trial of the project, I am a person who especially loves Ev-MCQ games. Thank you for the interesting suggestion!

In my opinion, this section needs more addition, the proponent said to create a web page containing information on the progress and status of the development, in theory, this is fine, showing that they intend to put the proposal out in the community so everyone can easily check their progress. What is missing here are the KPIs, although the roadmap for the proposal is well presented, it is not enough for us to check the project progress without the KPIs. It would be better to list a few stats that are directly measurable so that everything can be tracked more clearly. And about the success of the project is well defined that is: -Teachers get passive income from generated content, every time students bet/answer via BOUNDER -Students not only have fun because of more knowledge but also have more income

• Finally Kahoot formidable web3 competitor