not approved
Multi-Round Proposals
Current Project Status
unfunded
Total
amount
Received
$0
Total
amount
Requested
$250,000
Total
Percentage
Received
0.00%
Solution
Problem

Can we increase voting participation by reducing the volume of proposals through a multi-round selection process.

Addresses Challenge
Feasibility
Auditability

Team

1 member

Why is it important?

The volume of proposals prevents voters from participating in making a decision (positive or negative) against all of them.

What does success look like?

The number of wallets that vote for proposals increases compared to other challenge types.

Key Metrics to measure

Unique voting wallets count

Challenge brief

This is an experimental challenge with no “theme” or collective problem type for proposals to address. Proposals will be voted on over 3 rounds, with the bottom proposals being dropped at the end of each. By having less proposals for each subsequent round, more voters should be able to review and make a decision.

The cutoff for proposals in round 1 will be once twice the challenge’s funds are “allocated” to voted proposals (i.e. $500,000).

The cutoff for proposals in round 2 will be once 1.5x the challenge’s funds are “allocated” to voted proposals (i.e. $375,000).

The remaining proposals will then be voted on for the actual challenge funds of $250,000 in round 3.

Community Reviews (1)

Comments

close

Playlist

  • EP2: epoch_length

    Authored by: Darlington Kofa

    3m 24s
    Darlington Kofa
  • EP1: 'd' parameter

    Authored by: Darlington Kofa

    4m 3s
    Darlington Kofa
  • EP3: key_deposit

    Authored by: Darlington Kofa

    3m 48s
    Darlington Kofa
  • EP4: epoch_no

    Authored by: Darlington Kofa

    2m 16s
    Darlington Kofa
  • EP5: max_block_size

    Authored by: Darlington Kofa

    3m 14s
    Darlington Kofa
  • EP6: pool_deposit

    Authored by: Darlington Kofa

    3m 19s
    Darlington Kofa
  • EP7: max_tx_size

    Authored by: Darlington Kofa

    4m 59s
    Darlington Kofa
0:00
/
~0:00