A systematic approach, The "filtering" and "clear criteria" approach will help to shortlist the top Blockchain platform and then the Layer 2 project develop on top of that. This will save time, resources and provide quality information for the community. Thank you for sharing and love to see this idea in implementation. One question: is there any plan to incentivize the Community Member to join in the filtering process ~ similar like CA "concept" of Catalyst to leverage the strength of community members.

The Crypto's uptrend season and the covid 19 pandemic have brought many people to the crypto world, but because of that, the number of investors losing money by scam projects is very huge. The reason is that there are too much scam, bad projects and investors themselves lack basic knowledge about blockchain to be able to distinguish whether a project should or should not invest. Proposal has outlined a solution to help investors avoid losing money through a project self-assessment website. Currently, there are also many websites or social channels that give project reviews, but they are very general. I was completely impressed with how the proposer rated the project when I checked out the clips they posted on the proposer's youtube channel. They evaluate a project in great detail such as team members, financial games, marketing activities, especially about the project's technology solutions (they perform technology evaluations based on document analysis and peer-review). knowledgeable people). If this model is applied to the website of the proposal, it will be a huge impact on the community. Through the website, the community can view quality, transparent and decentralized reviews because the assessment will be done by the community itself. According to the proposer's description, to see a review of a project, viewers must contribute to the community itself to get points and redeem points to see the project they want to see. I see that in the future this will become a large community and operates base on knowledge and transparency

The proposal will help investors to get rid of scam projects. Vcoincheck.io website is the page what posts crypto projects and investors can read, search and review projects objectively. Vcoincheck.io website not only posts crypto projects, but also evaluate these projects to be good or bad that investors can avoid and pick up good ones.

Right from the start, the author of the proposal succinctly and efficiently explains to us the key issues involved in the analysis of a project by kols, youtuber and social media that misleading the investors. My understanding is that there also certain of websites and mobile applications provide the scoring for the projects but the investors also don't understanding how such scoring process works.

It is the great idea to provide the framework (ie the yes/no questions) for investor to do their own evaluation and system will keep that work for others investors to reference. This proposal fit to the challenges since the investor can use to evaluate cardano's projects.

One points I would suggest is that the proposer consider to distribute the evaluation into blockchain then it show the transparencies of each evaluation (ie: could not edit, delete…)

The proposal indicate investor's problem directly. The website will provide tools to clarify scams projects and helps investor to relize good projects so that they can put their money at right projects.

This is a good proposal. It is proposed to identify the problem that many investors lose money because of lack of knowledge to recognize and evaluate projects, leading to high risks when investing. This proposal develops a tool to help investors self-assess the project and minimize investment risks. If this tool and website develops into multiple languages, I think it will help many investors in the world invest more safely and effectively.

This is a proposal on evaluating and ranking projects with clear goals and implementation, KPI in 3 months of the proposal. The working team has many years of experience in the crypto industry, enough expertise to do it. It is hoped that the proposal will be implemented soon to make project information transparent and avoid risks for investors. This is the important data store of the entire cardano ecosystem, where an idea like this is not present in the ecosystem.

"The number of projects currently on the crypto market is very large and eliminating scam projects and finding good projects to invest in is a real need. Most of the scam projects are very good at marketing, so investors are easily led by the fake information of those projects. This Proposal helps people answer important project-related questions for themselves is a great way to keep investors from being led by misinformation.

In addition, people can develop the ability to self-assess projects that they are interested in. This will help investors improve their knowledge and they can take full responsibility for their investment decisions.

This proposal also creates an objective source of information because the website's content is built largely from the community"

The project is highly realistic, is the idea of ​​creating a website to evaluate and rate projects through asking questions for the community to contribute knowledge and multi-dimensional perspectives. This is an assessment tool based on criteria such as: identity of the project owner, technology solutions, tokenomics, influence of the project through communication. In addition, this is a repository of information about blockchain projects, and connects financial resources to quality projects.

The notion of building a website to review and grade projects by asking questions for the community to contribute information and multi-dimensional viewpoints is very plausible. This is an evaluation tool based on characteristics such as the project owner's identification, technical solutions, tokenomics, and the project's communication influence. This is also a collection of knowledge about blockchain initiatives, as well as a platform that connects financial resources with high-quality projects.

This proposal is about building a website to help investors self-assess the projects they are interested in through questions to know if the project is good or not. This is a very great and useful idea. The problem is clearly described and explained in detail. The solution is clearly defined with a procedure of 02 steps and roadmap ad specific KPIs. This solution shows the clear expected impact on the Cardano ecosystem in short term and long term. Therefore, based on the given information, I strongly agree with this proposal's impact, I can rate it with a score of 5

This proposal seeks to help investors make the right decisions and invest profitably and avoid scam projects. This proposal can fit into Fund 7 challenge setting so that it can benefit the larger community globally. The impact as stated in the proposal is to create objective information from communities and help everyone get rid of scam projects and find out good projects to invest their money.

The budget is well-broken into details and clear KPIs metrics and milestones to achieve the proposal stage. Also, it also showcases clearly the mechanism to attract the evaluators. One source of truth is the website to see the progress updated by this proposal

All informations to audit were listed in proposal: Team member experience: Can join their telegram community and audit Roadmap, KPI, funding breakdown are detailed with specific number. We can audit through proposal website's activities.

Through their roadmap, the process of building website is feasibility. They focus on evaluating more than 100 projects in 3 months firstly. These projects are evaluated by the member of the website and their communication. Each of week, the member of the proposal will evalutate more than 10 projects per week. And then after 3 months, thay can get 100 projects. The number is reasonable and their roadmap will be done promply.

The KPI provided were clear and easy to tracking by the communitive.

As you said on the proposal, the more people do the assessment provided is more objective. The team should add more KPIs about the website visitors as well. Since visitors may not do their own assessment but they can refer to other assessment and verify it with the resource. Lastly I hope you make it, I'm rooting for you and will be glad to be one of your future users.

The proposal provide a clear development roadmap. The proposal outlines the goals for each stage and the KPI for evaluating the goals. The proposal a clear, easy-to-understand description.

Their plan is described carefully from the proposal's roadmap that the proposal can accomplish their timeline on time. Information gets from the proposal that can achieve their mission to help investors to avoid scam projects

The road map showing 3 months of project work is very detailed with every assigned task. It shows the number of expected evaluated projects as 100 during the period. The budget breakdown is clear and comprehensive. Good proposal.

The proposer has outlined the costs, roadmap and major elements of the work behind this proposal. All the information about the projects that have been evaluated, the number of people accessing the website, the number of people evaluating the projects on the website, etc. are displayed on the website which is a great way to track the results of the proposal. Anyone can check the success of the proposal easily.

I have read KPI for the first 3 months of the project. I found this project's results completely testable by looking at the number of projects evaluated, the set of questions and evaluation criteria when it was made public. Also I appreciate the experience of the project founding team.

When this website started construction and users saw information on the group, we saw the number of projects evaluated from the community, the source of information through questions for the community to build a new style. richness as well as the quality of this information. The greater the number of constructions, the more objective and verifiable it is to be.

For the first three months of the project, I read KPI. When the results of this research were made public, I found them to be totally testable by looking at the number of projects evaluated, the set of questions, and the evaluation criteria. I also value the project's original team's experience.

This proposal provided a wide range of information with reference/proof (documents/links,…) for verifying. My only advice is: for better understanding, you should integrate KPIs into the roadmap; this would help the community easier to track this proposal's progress. Therefore, based on the given information, I strongly agree with this proposal's auditability, I can rate it with a score of 5